Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tredyffrin‑Easttown board backs 'fair funding' resolution; one member abstains amid debate over legislative vs. board action

Tredyffrin-Easttown School Board · February 26, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board voted to adopt a resolution supporting equitable state education funding and urging legislative action; one board member abstained arguing the issue belongs at the legislature, and a member of the public urged the board not to oppose school‑choice options such as charter or scholarship programs.

The Tredyffrin‑Easttown School Board on Feb. 26 voted to adopt a resolution supporting fair funding of education in Pennsylvania, joining other area districts in urging state action to address disparities identified by the Basic Education Funding Commission (BEFC).

Dr. Torres summarized the ad hoc legislative committee’s recommendation to advance the resolution and noted it references recent court rulings and BEFC recommendations but does not prescribe a specific remedy. The resolution also expresses opposition to proposals that would divert public funds to nonpublic schools without robust accountability, such as the proposed Pennsylvania Award for Student Success (PASS) scholarships.

Board discussion included support from Mary Ann Piccione, who said neighboring districts are passing similar resolutions and that the district should add its voice. Susan Audrain said she supported robust public funding but would abstain because she believes legislative bodies — not local boards — are the appropriate venue for these policy decisions. Mr. Hong emphasized the district’s position opposes funding for nonpublic schools that lack strong academic and fiscal accountability while supporting targeted aid for low‑income students in low‑achieving districts.

During public comment, Jay Joyce said he opposed the resolution because it could limit school choice and noted charter schools are public; he urged the board to vote against it. The board noted the resolution references existing programs such as charter schools and scholarship programs in its text.

The board voted to adopt the resolution; the transcript records one abstention and the remainder in favor. If passed, the resolution will be shared with state legislators and the governor as described in the agenda materials.