Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Convention Center Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate advances ballot-cleanup and convention-center financing bill after extended debate over scope and transparency
Summary
Lawmakers advanced LB 116, a bill to expand how counties may reinvest lodging-tax turnbacks for convention-center projects, after lengthy questions about geographic reach, a $150 million project cap and public-engagement protections. The bill moves to E&R initial.
Senator Ballard on behalf of proponents introduced LB 116, saying the bill would give counties “greater flexibility in reinvesting lodging tax dollars into county owned projects that are valuable to the local tourism industry.” The measure would amend the Nebraska Visitor Development Act and add cleanup language to the Convention Center Facility Financing Assistance Act.
Why it matters: supporters said the change would let counties use turn-back tax dollars to plan, expand and maintain convention facilities and associated projects aimed at drawing conventions and visitors. Ballard said the bill was intended to let counties “strategically adopt convention center and future proof into human wants, events, and as technology evolves.”
Lawmakers pressed for details. Senator Conrad asked whether the bill would allow the project area to be drawn broadly and asked, “600 yards sounds pretty significant,” noting the statute previously referenced a 600-yard parameter. Senator Ballard responded the bill requires projects to be within the political subdivision where they are built and that the intention was to limit the eligible area to that subdivision. Conrad also pressed whether the legislation weakens public-engagement protections by permitting evidence to be provided after a public hearing; Ballard said that language came from the county and offered to tighten it before select file.
Other questions centered on fiscal limits and governance. Senator McKinney asked whether the cash fund referenced is capped and who contributes to it; Ballard said the cash fund would be seeded by a turn-back of lodging taxes and that the $150,000,000 figure was intended as a project cap. Conrad noted the bill’s draft appeared to permit the $150 million limit “per any 1 approved project,” which could allow several projects to draw funds and increase the aggregate exposure, and asked Ballard to clarify intent.
Ballard said discussions had involved county officials, consultants and a group called Assemble Lincoln, which had been considering potential sites in Lincoln. He said the county wants the project to move forward as an economic driver and that local officials were trying to ensure city budgets would be held harmless. Senator Hanson added that the bill carries no state fiscal note and reiterated that LB 116 does not appropriate state general funds: “This does not cost Nebraska taxpayers anything,” Hanson said.
Outcome: After extended questions and an offer by Ballard to work with colleagues on clarifying language, LB 116 advanced to E&R initial (clerk recorded 36 a's, 1 nay). The bill sponsor indicated willingness to tighten public-engagement language on select file.
Next steps: LB 116 will be placed on E&R initial where technical corrections and revisor edits are verified; sponsors indicated further drafting to clarify limits on eligible areas, the $150 million cap, and the public-engagement provisions.
