Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews handbook and 2025 board calendar; approves agenda and moves to closed session on superintendent evaluation
Summary
The board compared its handbook to the MSBA template and reviewed the ABCD calendar for 2025, including meeting dates and reduced study sessions; the agenda was approved by voice and the board entered a closed session under Minn. Stat. §13D.05 to conduct the superintendent’s annual evaluation.
After the Balanced Budget Model presentation, the board reviewed its annual school board handbook against the Minnesota School Boards Association (MSBA) template, noting reorganized sections on duties, conflicts of interest, meeting types and the superintendent’s role in meetings. A draft Google Doc version of the handbook and related materials were made available to board members for review before the Dec. 17 meeting.
The board then examined the ABCD proposal, a draft annual calendar that sets 2025 meeting dates and priorities. Highlights include retaining two regular meetings most months, reducing the number of study sessions from 10 to 5, starting most meetings at 5:30 p.m. (with exceptions), and scheduling major decision items—strategic plan work, curriculum updates, facilities discussions and budget cycle milestones—throughout the year.
Procedural votes The meeting agenda was moved, seconded and approved by voice vote early in the session (no individual mover/second named on the record). Later the board voted to enter a closed session under Minnesota Statute Section 13D.05 Subd. 3(b) to evaluate the superintendent’s performance. The transcript records the motion, a second, and an affirmative voice vote; the board entered closed session and returned before adjourning at 8:05 p.m.
Next steps and scheduling Clerk McLaughlin read the list of attendees in the closed session and the board expects to summarize closed‑session conclusions at the Dec. 17 meeting as required by law. The Jan. 7 meeting remains scheduled as the next regular meeting and a date set for a conceptual vote on the funding model.
