Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public Works committee recommends $345 initial roll-off set and $150 follow-up fee; new front-loader truck ordered

Public Works Meeting · March 29, 2023
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee recommended forwarding a proposed change to roll-off rental fees — an initial set fee recorded in the packet as “3.45” (discussed as $345) and $150 for subsequent loads plus tonnage — and received an update that a front-loader truck is expected in about six weeks.

The Public Works meeting on operational services focused on roll-off rental pricing and fleet needs, with staff recommending a higher follow-up fee and reporting on recent truck runs.

Speaker 3 presented a handout outlining recent runs to Smith County and the associated costs and timing, saying a round trip took about 49–52 minutes, consumed roughly 6 gallons of fuel over 34 miles and spent about 12 minutes at the landfill. "We charge them $45 a ton," Speaker 3 said when outlining how tonnage above included amounts is billed.

On fees, the packet listed the initial set as "3.45," which the committee discussed as $345 for the first set that includes up to 2 tons; Speaker 3 said each subsequent load from the same household would be charged $150 plus tonnage. Speaker 3 told the committee the county’s disposal payment is roughly $0.30–$0.37 per ton while charges to customers are higher, and that compacting packed loads reduces trips and cost.

Members asked about differences in hauling Class 1 (regular waste) versus Class 3 (demolition) material and the operational effect of quick turnarounds at the landfill. Speaker 2 moved that the committee recommend the fee structure presented by Speaker 3 (initial set as listed in the packet; subsequent loads $150 plus tonnage); Speaker 1 recorded the motion and the committee voted to forward the recommendation to the full court for approval.

Separately, Speaker 3 reported a front-loader truck has been ordered and should ship from the manufacturer this week; delivery was estimated at about 45 days, with the truck expected in roughly six weeks. The committee said staff had also reviewed roll-off truck options but proceeded with the front-loader order to meet timing needs.

Next steps: the committee will forward the fee recommendation to the full court for formal approval and will proceed with the truck procurement and delivery schedule.