Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Perkiomen Valley board adopts revised policies tied to Title IX after extended debate
Summary
The Perkiomen Valley School District board adopted two packages of revised policies — including three Title IX–related policies — after a lengthy debate about whether to wait for pending federal action; the board also adopted multiple policy updates and administrative items.
The Perkiomen Valley School District Board of School Directors on a majority vote adopted a pair of policy packages that include revised procedures tied to Title IX regulations, concluding a prolonged and at times contentious discussion about timing and legal risk.
Board members voted to split the policy motion into two parts and then approved 9.02a (adoption of policies 1.03, 1.031 and 1.032) by roll call and 9.02b (the remaining listed policies) by voice vote. The packages update procedures the administration says align the district with the U.S. Department of Education’s August 2024 Title IX regulations.
Why it matters: The policy updates address investigation procedures, appeal rights and other Title IX-related processes that determine how the district responds to discrimination complaints. Supporters said adopting the changes now ensures that students’ rights and procedures are clear under current federal rules; opponents urged delaying adoption until after anticipated federal actions tied to a new administration.
Board debate focused on two linked questions: whether the district should adopt policy language now to conform to the Department of Education’s recent regulations, and whether certain recital language acknowledging racial and ethnic disparities should appear in the MOU/recitals or be left off. Opponents argued that rules are unsettled and recommended waiting; proponents and the solicitor said the August 2024 regulations are effective and the district has previously updated policies to reflect federal changes.
District solicitor Mister Suber summarized the legal position for the board, saying the Department of Education’s regulation is currently in effect and “has the force of law” until altered by a court or subsequent rulemaking. Administration and several board members said the policies are written to conform to current law and can be revised later if rules change.
Mister Sailor and several others urged caution. One board member said that given expected federal developments on Jan. 20 it would be “wise” to wait and see how national guidance evolves before adopting the new wording. Supporters of immediate adoption, including members of the policy committee, argued the district has previously updated policy in response to federal guidance and that students need clear protections now.
Votes at a glance (selected): - 9.02a (policies 1.03, 1.031, 1.032): Adopted by roll-call vote (majority yes; dissent recorded). - 9.02b (remaining listed policies): Adopted by voice vote.
What’s next: The administration and the policy committee retain authority to return to the board with revisions if federal or judicial developments require changes. The board instructed administration to proceed with implementation consistent with the adopted language.
The meeting also included several other approvals and routine business summarized in a separate "Votes at a glance" list below.
