Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Perkiomen Valley board questions use of flexible instructional days after superintendent’s update

Perkiomen Valley School District Board of School Directors · December 2, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members pressed administration over when the district may call virtual 'flexible instructional days' (FIDs) and whether those can be used before built-in inclement-weather days; administration agreed to review the board‑approved plan and report back.

Board members at the Perkiomen Valley School District meeting on Dec. 1 pressed administration to clarify when the district may replace in‑person school with flexible instructional days (FIDs). The FID policy allows virtual instruction as an alternative to canceling school for weather or emergencies, but board members said the language should be clearer about whether FIDs can be used before the district exhausts its three built‑in inclement‑weather days.

"Once the 3 built in inclement weather days have been exhausted, then the district can announce FID days," said a board member reading language from the plan. Doctor Russell responded that her understanding differed and she would review the board‑approved plan and follow up. The superintendent cited a provision that allows the superintendent to exercise discretion for "extenuating environmental circumstances" — for example, floods or isolated building outages — and used a transformer failure at the high school as an example of a situation where a FID was used.

Board members asked for clarification on thresholds — how many students without power, for instance, would warrant a FID — and discussed the limits of remote instruction (power outages would make FIDs impractical). Administration committed to reviewing the plan language, confirming whether the board‑passed policy requires using built‑in inclement days before FIDs, and returning with recommended clarifications and next steps.