Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BCCMC audit finds unmodified opinion but repeats segregation-of-duties and procurement findings
Summary
The Baker County correctional management board received an auditor's report showing an unmodified audit opinion alongside two repeated findings, including lack of segregation of duties and some procurements the auditor said did not comply with bidding statutes; the board accepted the audit and discussed cleaning up asset records.
The BCCMC board on the meeting approved the year-end financial audit, which the auditor said carried an unmodified opinion consistent with the prior year while also flagging repeated internal-control weaknesses.
The auditor told the board that net position decreased by about $15,407 year over year and that operating expenses rose substantially. "There were two repeats of findings this year from the prior year," the auditor said, adding that one repeated issue was a "lack of segregation of duties" in the accounting function and another related to procurements that the auditor judged were not properly bid.
Board members discussed practical constraints. The auditor said the board had implemented "compensating controls to the extent possible to mitigate this weakness," but recommended additional oversight because one staff member was performing multiple accounting roles: "Booking everything, reporting this to the accounting entries, writing the checks, reconciling the account," the auditor said, adding that this concentration of duties increases exposure.
The auditor also pointed the board to the management letter and to notes on the USDA loans and other disclosures. The report included discussions of the statement of net position, statement of activities and the cash flow statement, and noted that USDA obligations declined $918,000 year over year.
Board members said they had been aware of many of these issues during the year and discussed steps to correct asset classification and procurement records. The auditor noted that some prior-period asset entries would be adjusted and that staff and legal advisers would prepare reconciliations and prior-period adjustments as needed. The board voted to accept the audit report.
The board was left with a set of follow-ups: cleaning up personal-property entries on the books, considering stronger segregation of duties, and following the auditor's recommended adjustments and management-letter items.
