Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Baker County commission asks staff to draft stronger nepotism language as personnel policy is rewritten
Summary
Commissioner Bennett urged the board to adopt clearer nepotism rules beyond state statute; after extended debate the board directed staff and the county attorney to draft a proposed Baker County nepotism policy for the January meeting.
Commissioner Bennett introduced a review of the county—s nepotism language during a wider personnel-policy rewrite and urged the board to consider rules that go beyond the Florida statute. He warned of potential conflicts when relatives work in the same unit or chain of command and said he does not support allowing relatives in direct reporting relationships.
County attorney Rich and staff explained Florida law already prohibits subordinate/supervisor relationships between relatives but allows counties to adopt more restrictive rules. Commissioners discussed potential grandfathering, disclosure requirements on employment applications and remedies (for example, Putnam County—s 90-day remediation period when an unusual supervisory relationship arises). Several commissioners asked staff to draft a policy that addresses spouses, promotions, and reporting relationships and to present a proposed document at the second January meeting.
No formal action was taken to adopt a policy; the board directed staff and the attorney to prepare a draft for future consideration.
Ending: Staff and the county attorney will prepare draft policy language and circulate it to commissioners for review prior to the January meeting.
