Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Votes And Permits topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Drainage board approves minutes, contractor payments and DLZ utility crossing permit

St. Joseph County Drainage Board · September 9, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its meeting the St. Joseph County Drainage Board approved the July minutes, a list of payments to contractors, and a DLZ permit for trenchless utility crossings associated with the State Road 2 lift-station/sewer project (Project No. 92403-S); they also discussed a ranch subdivision easement that remains on hold pending a signed agreement.

The St. Joseph County Drainage Board took several routine and project-permitting votes during its meeting. The board approved the July minutes by voice vote after S2 moved and S3 seconded. The board also approved a list of payments to contractors presented in the mayor’s report after S5 moved to accept them.

Michael Geiger of DLZ (S11) presented a permit request on behalf of the St. Joseph County Redevelopment Commission for trenchless installation of two 16-inch ductile iron water mains, a 16-inch ductile iron force main and two 2-inch HDPE conduits for fiber optic beneath the Nesbajani (transcript also contains a variant spelling 'Nesbocyanne') Ditch at the northwest corner of State Road 2 and Lisonbee Drive. Geiger said the crossing will be installed a minimum of five feet below the ditch bottom using trenchless excavation methods as part of the State Road 2 Lift Station Force Main and Sewer Project (St. Joseph County Project No. 92403-S). Bids for the work were noted as due the following day. The board voted to approve the permit.

Separately, the board discussed a ranch subdivision encroachment into a drainage easement. County staff and the board said final signatures on the easement could not be completed at the meeting because a required signed easement agreement between property owners was not yet on file; the board asked staff to obtain the signed agreement and return the matter for acknowledgment at a subsequent meeting.

S2 moved to adjourn after a short legal question about virtual public comment was answered by the county attorney (unnamed in the transcript); the motion carried by voice vote.

Actions taken at the meeting (as recorded in the public transcript) include approval of the July minutes, approval of contractor payments, approval of HRP’s dewatering discharge (reported separately) and approval of the DLZ ditch crossing permit.