Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nebraska senators approve suspension of rule to allow shorter committee-notice window
Summary
Senators voted to suspend Rule 3, Section 14 twice to permit standing committees to schedule Jan. 27 hearings on six days’ notice instead of seven, citing scheduling constraints after a holiday. The motions were adopted with recorded ayes and no nays.
Get email alerts on the Legislative Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator Arch moved and explained a procedural motion to suspend Rule 3, Section 14 so standing committees that meet on Monday could schedule public hearings with six days’ notice instead of the usual seven, saying the change was needed because yesterday was a holiday and seven days’ notice was not feasible. "This is a routine motion here and it is simply because it's Tuesday," Arch said, urging colleagues to vote yes so committees could schedule hearings for Jan. 27.
The presiding officer put the question to the chamber and Mister Clark recorded the votes. The motion was adopted in the first instance with the clerk announcing 33 ayes and no nays. Arch later explained there had been miscommunication about committee schedules and again sought suspension; the motion carried a second time when the clerk recorded 30 ayes and no nays.
The suspension allows the Education, General Affairs and Transportation committees (and others identified in the notices) to proceed with public hearings on Jan. 27 with the shortened notice period. Arch emphasized that the suspension was intended to accommodate scheduling constraints and said he would monitor attendance to ensure the body reached the required 30 votes.
No amendments or roll-call objections were recorded in the transcript beyond the announced counts. Following the second suspension, clerks announced additional committee hearing notices for General Affairs, Transportation, Health and Human Services, and Urban Affairs, and the clerk continued reading a large set of bills that had been introduced that morning.
The most immediate procedural effect is that affected committees may proceed with published hearing schedules on the Jan. 27 date. Senators did not debate the underlying bills in connection with the suspension vote; the votes reported were on the procedural rule suspension only.
