Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Sales topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Louisa County approves sales of multiple small conservation parcels
Summary
The Louisa County Board of Supervisors approved a series of resolutions to sell seven small conservation parcels south of Conesville (resolutions 202443–202449), with listed per-acre prices and individual buyers. Motions were made, seconded and approved by voice votes.
Get email alerts on the Property Sales topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Louisa County Board of Supervisors approved a block of seven resolutions authorizing sale of small conservation parcels south of Conesville on Highway 70.
Speaker 1 moved to approve resolution 202443 selling a 0.24-acre parcel to John and Alfredo Murphy at $3,130.75 per acre for a total of $754.51; Speaker 2 seconded and the motion passed with board members responding “Aye” (SEG 394-399, SEG 400-406). Subsequent resolutions approved sales to the same buyers and to others: resolution 202444 (Murphys, 0.236 acres, $738.86), resolution 202445 (David Roberts, 0.229 acres, $716.94), resolution 202446 (Troy and Stacy House, 0.229 acres, $716.94), resolution 202447 (Detroit and Stacy House, 0.23 acres, $720.70), resolution 202448 (T Bell Properties LLC, 0.29 acres, $907.92) and resolution 202449 (Amy Suekirk, ~0.29 acres, $907.92). Each motion was presented, seconded and recorded as approved.
The board characterized these as small, conservation-approved parcels and handled them as a group during the business portion of the meeting. No public objections or additional conditions were recorded in the transcript. The motions were handled by board members present and approved by voice vote.
The board did not read or attach deed conditions or closing timelines in the recorded discussion; the transcript records buyer names, parcel sizes, per‑acre prices and totals but does not specify closing dates or further sale conditions.
Next steps: the resolutions passed and will advance through the county’s normal property-transfer and recording process; the transcript does not specify closing dates or administrative follow-up timelines.

