Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews default‑budget rules under RSA 40:139‑b and 15‑year budget history
Summary
Administrators explained how the FY26 default budget will be calculated under RSA 40:139‑b, showing the statutory formula and a 15‑year history of proposed versus default budgets. Presenters warned the default can be higher or lower than a proposed operating budget and previewed forthcoming budget committee meetings and deliberative session dates.
Get email alerts on the Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Administrators walked the Timberlane Regional School District board through the statutory definition and calculation of a default budget under RSA 40:139‑b, emphasizing that the formula may produce a default amount higher or lower than a proposed operating budget.
Presenter Maria (finance/administration) read the statute aloud and summarized the calculation steps: start with the prior fiscal year's voted budget, add debt service, multi‑year contracts and legally mandated obligations, and subtract one‑time expenditures and positions eliminated in the proposed budget. She and Superintendent Justin Krueger illustrated the math with a visual example and a 15‑year district history packet the board will receive.
Board members asked how often the default exceeded the proposed budget; speakers referenced different counts from the packet and discussion: at one point an administrator said the default was higher twice, and later a board member said that, over 15 years, the default was higher eight times in the district record. Administrators emphasized the packet contains year‑by‑year details and that the calculation is a statutory formula with limited local discretion.
Administrators also previewed schedule next steps: a joint budget committee (BUDCOM) meeting, a December 16 joint meeting and a final proposed budget number to be presented to the board in December. The board was told to expect the special education and transportation numbers to be finalized before the next committee meeting.
The board did not adopt a budget at this meeting; members asked staff to deliver the historical charts and to bring a final proposed number to upcoming BUDCOM and deliberative sessions.

