Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Plaistow Planning Board reviews wide-ranging zoning amendments, schedules prime‑wetlands public hearing

Plaistow Planning Board · November 6, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Nov. 6 meeting the Plaistow Planning Board reviewed attorney comments on a package of zoning amendments — including prime‑wetlands buffer language, ordinance renumbering, preliminary design‑review authority, definitions and enforcement provisions — and set a Dec. 4 hearing for prime wetlands and a Dec. 18 hearing for the remaining items.

The Plaistow Planning Board spent most of its Nov. 6 meeting reviewing attorney feedback on a package of proposed zoning amendments and agreeing a schedule for public hearings. Board members discussed changes to wetland buffer language, procedural 'housekeeping' edits such as renumbering, the board's authority to require preliminary conceptual or design review, expanded definitions for notice to abutters, temporary-structure permit renewals, and proposed enforcement language naming the Board of Selectmen as the enforcing authority.

Speaker 5 summarized counsel's view and the proposed edits, saying, according to a readback of draft language, that at a prior public hearing "the proposed buffer size for the parking and structure is being reduced to a 100 feet," and recommended concise voters-guide text that explains key changes when the board publishes ordinance explanations. The board discussed a common concern that allowing textual changes can be a "slippery slope," and members agreed to limit immediate changes to renumbering and clearly defined housekeeping items while sending substantive questions back to legal counsel for confirmation.

Members debated adding a specific right for the Planning Board to require applicants, on a case-by-case basis, to participate in preliminary conceptual consultation or design review. Proponents said early review helps identify major issues for complex applications before formal submission; others cautioned about imposing extra steps on small applicants. Speaker 5 said the proposed language would "authorize the planning board to require, when in their opinion, either the nature or the scope of a proposed application ... to participate in a preliminary conceptual consultation or design review," and noted it would require coordination with planning staff.

The draft also widens the definition of "abutter" to reflect recent statutory language that includes properties across the street or stream, a change Speaker 5 said will increase the number of notified properties in some cases. The board reviewed proposed definitions for enforcement-related roles (building inspector and code-enforcement officer) and discussed wording that would allow contracted personnel to perform enforcement duties if needed.

On temporary structures, the board discussed a limit on construction-trailer permits to 18 months with six-month renewals while construction is active. The board also considered a conditional-use allowance for small on-site caretaker or security dwelling units (the draft references an approximate 800-square-foot limit of habitable area) for certain commercial or industrial zones; members noted this would create a narrowly defined residential use and agreed it could be tabled for further review.

Speaker 5 said he will circulate the revised enforcement paragraph to the Board of Selectmen for feedback; the proposed enforcement clause states that "the ordinance shall be enforced by the Board of Selectmen" and allows the board to delegate administrative enforcement duties to a town official. The Planning Board agreed prime-wetlands should be handled as a separate hearing because of expected public interest and set Dec. 4 for prime-wetlands and Dec. 18 for the bulk of the remaining amendments, with fallback dates in January.

The board repeatedly emphasized that substantive legal or textual changes that could alter intended meaning will be cleared with counsel and, where necessary, sent to the town's legislative process before final adoption. No final zoning votes were taken at the Nov. 6 meeting; the board's next meeting will revisit attorney comments and any revisions before formal public hearings.