Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Shore Based Shark Regulation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

DMF to seek public comment on shore‑based shark angling limits and chumming ban to reduce white‑shark interactions

Marine Fisheries Advisory Commission · December 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff proposed prohibiting shore‑based shark angling in ocean‑facing high‑encounter areas, banning shore‑based chumming, restricting delivery methods to casting only, and tightening gear (hook/leader) rules; law enforcement voiced support for clearer, enforceable gear and area definitions.

DMF staff proposed a set of measures Dec. 17 aimed at reducing shore‑based interactions with white sharks, including area‑based prohibitions on shore‑based shark angling where white sharks are most likely to be encountered, a statewide ban on shore‑based chumming, limits on bait‑delivery methods (casting only), and gear restrictions (hook and leader specifications) to improve enforcement and public safety.

Jared summarized the map‑based approach: the proposal would prohibit shore‑based shark angling on many ocean‑facing beaches along the eastern Cape and into the area north to the New Hampshire border while carving out inner‑bay areas (Kingston, Plymouth, Duxbury) and historical non‑white‑shark shore fisheries (south coast and islands). "We define shore based shark angling as both the use of a baited hook with a hook size of greater than 8 aught and a metal leader attached," Jared said, noting the goal was clearer rules to aid enforcement and public reporting.

Guest Dr. Greg Skomal emphasized social media‑driven growth in shore‑based shark targeting and said several states (Florida, New York) have moved to regulate shore‑based shark fishing. Lieutenant Matt Bass of Mass Environmental Police told the commission law enforcement participated in the proposal development and supports clearer gear and area definitions as more enforceable than relying on intent determinations.

Staff will add the proposal to the winter public‑hearing schedule and expects to consider potential carve‑outs (e.g., bluefish historical gear, kayak delivery allowances or an exemption for small‑scale baiting) based on comments and enforcement practicality.