Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Manchester aldermen receive file on Clay Street handicap parking request; Elm Street school zone noted
Summary
The Manchester Board Mayor & Aldermen received the file on a requested handicap parking space on Clay Street despite a DPW recommendation against it and noted a proposed school zone on Elm Street for Webster School; officials raised concerns about residential driveways and potential misuse of curbside handicap spots.
Get email alerts on the Traffic Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Manchester Board Mayor & Aldermen on an unnamed date considered a traffic division request to create a curbside handicap parking space on the north side of Clay Street, described as spanning from a point 270 feet west of Cypress Street to 30 feet west of that same street. Board members were told the Department of Public Works does not recommend the change.
Board members questioned whether the residence in front of the proposed space already has private parking, with an alderman saying the house has parking for two to three vehicles and asking why an on-street handicap space would be needed. A DPW staff member cautioned that curbside handicap spaces in residential areas can become problematic when the household moves and the sign remains, and said in denser, multifamily areas such spots may be warranted but not in this case.
The chair split the traffic agenda items and sought a motion specifically on the handicap parking request. The transcript records a motion described as 'receive file' on the handicap parking item; the motion was seconded and the board responded with 'Aye' votes. The transcript does not list a roll-call tally by name or provide a written ordinance or permit number for the request, and the minutes do not record a formal DPW-approved ordinance—only that the file was received.
Staff also noted a proposed school zone on Elm Street between Carpenter and Bennington for Webster School; no formal vote or implementation details for the school zone appear in the transcript. The board did not record timing, enforcement details, or follow-up steps for the Elm Street school zone in the provided text.
Board members emphasized caution when granting residential curbside handicap spaces and referenced the DPW recommendation against the Clay Street request. The transcript does not identify whether the requested curb marking will be re-filed, modified, or sent back to staff for further study.
