Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Approvals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Grand Island board approves several residential plans, asks for stone detail on rebuild
Summary
The Grand Island Board of Architects Review approved multiple residential designs on voice votes and requested an updated drawing showing Eldorado stone for a rebuild at Old Carriage (listed as 203/220), citing a cover-letter/drawing discrepancy.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Approvals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Speaker 1, a member of the Grand Island Board of Architects Review, opened the meeting and the board approved the November minutes before reviewing a series of residential plans. The board approved designs for 1890 Marjorie, 130 Sandywood, 2958 Stony Point, 515 Limestone Court, 227 Stonebridge, 161 Greenside and 177 Greenside by voice votes, typically on motions stating approval conditioned on meeting the board—s standard criteria.
The most substantive request came during review of the submission for 203 Old Carriage (also shown as 220 on the cover), where Speaker 1 said the cover letter indicated Eldorado stone would be used but the drawings did not show stone. "In the cover letter here, it says it's already closed out... the stone will be Eldorado," Speaker 1 said, and asked for an accurate drawing reflecting that stone. The board flagged the application as excessively similar to an earlier 223 plan and requested a revised drawing showing the stone to confirm the intended materials and facade differentiation.
Board members discussed several other submissions briefly. On 1890 Marjorie, members noted the property is a rebuild after a fire and asked about setbacks and whether a live fireplace or heat stove would be reinstalled; Speaker 2 commented the home "looks good." For 130 Sandywood, Speaker 1 recommended a white garage door to better conceal wear, saying a white door "won't show the dings from the tennis balls as much." For 2958 Stony Point members noted the large lot and advised the applicant to avoid wetlands; the board plans a site drive to confirm lot placement. The submission for 515 Limestone Court had been tabled or marked denied at a prior review, but members said the applicant had addressed concerns and the board approved that submission as presented.
All approvals reported were voice votes recorded as "aye" in the meeting transcript. No ordinances, statutes or external funding sources were referenced. The board adjourned with holiday greetings and said it will reconvene in January.
Votes at a glance - 1890 Marjorie: Motion to accept under general board criteria. Mover: Speaker 1; Second: Speaker 2. Outcome: Approved (voice vote, recorded "aye"). - 130 Sandywood: Motion to accept conditional on meeting board criteria. Mover: Speaker 2; Second: Speaker 1. Outcome: Approved (voice vote, recorded "aye"). - 2958 Stony Point: Motion to accept conditional on meeting board criteria. Mover: Speaker 2; Second: not specified. Outcome: Approved (voice vote, recorded "aye"). - 515 Limestone Court: Motion to accept as submitted. Mover: Speaker 1; Second: Speaker 2. Outcome: Approved (voice vote, recorded "aye"). - 227 Stonebridge: Motion to accept provided it meets town/board requirements. Mover: Speaker 1; Second: Speaker 2. Outcome: Approved (voice vote, recorded "aye"). - 161 Greenside: Motion to accept provided it meets board criteria. Mover: Speaker 2; Second: Speaker 1. Outcome: Approved (voice vote, recorded "aye"). - 177 Greenside: Motion to accept and proceed to other boards. Mover: Speaker 1; Second: Speaker 2. Outcome: Approved (voice vote, recorded "aye").
The board did not reference statutes, ordinances, grants, or external approvals during the meeting. The principal follow-up item is a request for a corrected drawing showing the Eldorado stone on the 203 Old Carriage/220 submission and confirmation that the design is not a duplicate of the 223 plan. The meeting closed with holiday remarks and a note that the board will meet in January.

