Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Utilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Town board agrees on $17 quarterly "water meter fee" to fund smart‑meter program

Grand Island Town Board · December 16, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Grand Island board reached consensus to label a new charge the "water meter fee," set the amount at $17 per household per quarter and direct staff to draft a resolution with narrow fund language; implementation is targeted for April and the resolution can be adopted subject to a permissive referendum.

The Grand Island Town Board agreed by consensus to move forward with a new quarterly charge labeled the "water meter fee" and indicated $17 per household per quarter as the working amount to fund replacement meters and the related reading infrastructure.

Speaker 3 opened the discussion by telling the board it needed to "decide what the name of this fee... we are adding to people's quarterly water bills." Board members debated label choices — equipment fee, capital improvement fee or water meter fee — and settled on a clear, narrow bill label to avoid future scope creep. Speaker 1 urged a tight limit on how the money can be used, saying the fund "should be extremely limited in scope."

The board reviewed budget estimates and an RFP process timeline. Speaker 3 cited a planner's spreadsheet and said the program's estimated cost "is gonna be between $5,600,000," and that "$17 a quarter per household would cover the repayment of the bond based on Corinne's numbers." Legal counsel (Speaker 7) explained two capital‑reserve approaches: a narrowly purposed reserve that is adopted subject to a permissive referendum at creation, or a broader reserve that avoids an initial referendum but triggers permissive referendum requirements on each spend. Speaker 7 said a narrow, purpose‑limited fund would align with the board's stated preference and offered a draft resolution.

Board members discussed whether the fee should be a sliding amount that declines as bond principal is paid or a fixed $17 for the bond term; Speaker 5 proposed keeping it fixed at $17 for the anticipated 15‑year bond. The group also agreed the resolution should state precise eligible uses (meters, software and infrastructure) while public notices and billing would use the common label "water meter fee." Speaker 3 volunteered to update public messaging and provide a contact email for residents.

The board directed staff and counsel to draft the formal resolution reflecting the agreed name, narrow permissible uses and a target effective date in April. Counsel explained the board could adopt the resolution "subject to permissive referendum" if they want the resolution effective in April while preserving referendum rights.

Next steps include drafting and circulating the resolution language, completing procurement steps (RFP for meters and infrastructure), and a planned public notification campaign before the new fee goes on bills.