Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves multiple parks projects, playscape and maintenance contracts funded by ARPA and MEDC grants
Summary
The council approved several capital projects and vendor contracts including a storage building and pavilion at Taylor Pedding Farm ($239,430 plus 6% contingency, MEDC grant), a dog park at Lane Park ($577,476 plus 4% contingency, ARPA), a playscape ($200,000 plus 5% contingency, MEDC), and a three‑year golf maintenance contract.
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Taylor City Council approved a package of parks projects and related contracts at its December 17 meeting.
The council awarded a contract to Sole Building Company to erect a storage building and pavilion at Taylor Pedding Farm for $239,430 plus a 6% contingency (not to exceed $253,796), funded through a MEDC grant. Parks staff said the structure will provide secure hay storage and party-room functionality; staff emphasized the project comes at no cost to the city’s general fund thanks to grant funding.
Council approved KAB Enterprises as the low bidder to install a dog park at Lane Park for $577,476 plus a 4% contingency, funded through ARPA capital outlay grants. Council members discussed the perceived high price and were advised that the bid includes perimeter fencing for the entire park and that the fencing will be industrial aluminum and poly‑coated cyclone where appropriate. Staff said cameras would be installed for additional security.
The council also approved Sinclair Recreation LLC to install a playscape at Taylor Pedding Farm for $200,000 plus a 5% contingency, funded through MEDC grants. Separately, the city authorized a three‑year agreement with Oliphant Golf Management as the preferred vendor for golf course maintenance; staff said they had budgeted for increased maintenance costs since the pre‑COVID contract era and expect to remain profitable.
Members asked about materials and long‑term maintenance costs for park buildings; parks staff said the chosen designs balance aesthetics with lower maintenance needs. The council approved each item by voice vote after brief discussion.
