Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City attorney gives commission refresher on quasi-judicial procedures
Summary
Interim City Attorney Golin led a quasi-judicial training covering oaths, ex parte disclosures, rules for evidence, rights of adversely affected parties, findings of fact, continuances and appeals to ensure due process at hearings affecting property rights.
Interim City Attorney Golin delivered a quasi-judicial refresher for the commission, outlining legal and procedural obligations when the commission sits in a quasi-judicial role.
Golin explained the order of proceedings (introduction, oath, applicant presentation, staff report, party presentations, rebuttal, public comment, board questions, closing arguments and motions), the requirement to base decisions on competent, substantial evidence, and the need for commissioners to disclose any ex parte contacts. He also reviewed how a party qualifies as an ‘adversely affected’ person and the 20‑minute presentation and 5‑minute rebuttal rules for parties at hearings.
The training covered standards for motions and findings of fact, grounds for continuation if additional evidence is needed, and the three common bases for appeals: denial of due process, lack of impartiality/ex parte disclosures, and insufficient competent substantial evidence.
Golin advised commissioners to avoid outside investigation and to request that any written materials be submitted to the clerk to become part of the public record. The session was presented as guidance to reduce legal risk and protect the integrity of property-rights hearings.
