Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Technology topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kettering council authorizes $329,280 court case‑management software purchase and supplemental appropriation

Kettering City Council · October 8, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved a resolution authorizing a $329,280 purchase to upgrade the municipal court’s case‑management software and a matching supplemental appropriation; officials said the purchase will be funded from court special projects and Clerk of Court computer funds, not the general fund.

Kettering City Council on Oct. 8 approved a resolution authorizing purchase and implementation of case‑management software upgrades for the Kettering Municipal Court and Clerk of Courts and approved a supplemental appropriation to make the funds available.

Mrs. Fisher introduced the resolution, saying the estimated 2024 purchase cost is $329,280 and that projected annual costs for 2025 through 2029 include $49,000 and an additional unclear line in the record described as "$187.50". She said the costs will be paid from the court special projects fund and the Clerk of Court computer fund and not from the city’s general tax fund.

Mr. Greason, answering council questions, described the upgrade as a multi‑area improvement to the courts’ legacy system, including text and email notifications for customers, a probation system upgrade, electronic document management and other functionality. He emphasized the funding source and noted the overall cost was lower than earlier projections.

Council approved both the purchase authorization and the supplemental appropriation on recorded roll calls (Council members present voted yes). City staff said appropriating the funds allows the previously authorized expenditure to be spent from the designated court funds.

No further details about vendor selection, contract length, or specific annual fee breakdowns were provided in the public record; staff offered to supply additional cost‑and‑budget detail on request.