Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents, students press Gwinnett board on literacy training, school safety and curriculum
Summary
At a lengthy public-comment segment Dec. 19, parents and students urged better literacy training and inclusion for students with disabilities, asked the district to reconsider the clear-backpack pilot and requested weapon detectors at schools; a dispute over the 'Choosing the Best' curriculum also surfaced.
Several students, parents and community members used the meeting's public-comment period Dec. 19 to press the board on literacy instruction, special-education placement, school safety and curriculum choices.
Literacy and teacher training: A parent who identified herself during the call to the podium (Missy Purcell) told the board that "Gwinnett County does not have dedicated content area coaches for literacy" and said recommended Wilson training for teachers amounted to "just 3 days," which she described as introductory rather than sufficient to train teachers to support students with dyslexia. She urged the board to fund sustained, comprehensive training in evidence-based literacy instruction and questioned spending priorities, citing a public-comment claim that the district spent about $13,000 last year on Reading Recovery.
Facilities and purchases: Elise Shepherd, a parent and teacher, urged the board to delay approval of the Central Gwinnett Baptist Church property purchase (agenda item 5.14) until the district addresses immediate needs in current schools and building expansions; she said she had mold-test samples from a classroom to illustrate her concern. Earlier in the meeting the superintendent removed item 5.14 from the consent agenda for further review.
School safety and backpacks: Several students urged installation of weapon detectors. First- and fourth-grade students from Ivy Creek Elementary described lockdown drills and argued detectors would reduce the chance of weapons entering schools; one student said, "Please help us get weapon detectors to protect us." Other commenters raised objections to the district's proposed clear-backpack pilot. Leilani (a GCPS graduate and employee) said the pilot could create significant waste, impose costs on families and threaten student privacy, and she urged the district to study pilot impacts before expanding it districtwide.
Curriculum debate: Parents spoke on opposite sides of sex-education curriculum choices. Jennifer Carpenter raised allegations of conflicts of interest tied to a curriculum called Choosing the Best and criticized its content; other speakers defended the program and cited local declines in teen pregnancy and STD rates as reasons to keep the curriculum.
Speakers also pressed for greater inclusion of students with disabilities in neighborhood schools. One parent said a child had been moved away from his siblings' school and described multiple reassignments that disrupted the child's learning and social connections.
Board members and staff listening to public comment repeatedly thanked speakers, encouraged use of the GCPS website to register formal feedback and emphasized that some items had been pulled from tonight's consent agenda for further review.
The public-comment segment informed the board's decision to leave policy BCBI on the table for additional input and to refer facility and curriculum questions to staff for follow-up.
