Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Diversion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court considers continuing jail risk-assessment program and a $20 PR-bond fee to fund it
Summary
Court reviewed a jail risk-assessment program that screens defendants for pretrial release; staff estimated $155,000 annual cost to continue the program and proposed a $20 fee (or up to 3%) on PR bond filings to fund personnel and convert temporary staff to regular part-time roles.
Commission court members and staff reviewed a jail risk-assessment program originally funded by a one-time grant and now scheduled to wind down. The program provides magistrates and judges with structured assessments to identify defendants who may qualify for personal-recognizance release and to flag behavioral-health candidates for diversion.
County staff and court administration said continuing the risk-assessment program would cost roughly $155,000 annually. To finance the service, staff proposed assessing a $20 PR-bond fee (or up to 3% of a bond amount as allowed) and converting two temporary positions to part-time roles to administer the assessments and track PR-bond compliance. Dale said part of the program’s cost could be offset by this fee and by pursuing interlocal agreements with the hospital district or behavioral-health partners.
Why it matters: participants said the program reduces jail population and expensive out-of-county transfers by identifying appropriate releases earlier in the jail intake and magistrate process. The judge and sheriff both described it as a practical tool for reducing detention costs and catching candidates for behavioral-health diversion earlier. The judge noted potential funding from the hospital district’s jail-diversion efforts and asked staff to explore interlocal options.
Direct quote: Dale explained the funding path and staffing conversion: “So the $20 fee will help pay for Merilee’s salary personnel,” and the judge added that the fee exists in law but requires court action to start assessing it.
Next steps: staff will provide a proposed fee ordinance/resolution and a draft interlocal to discuss with the hospital district and return with an implementation timeline and legal research on fee procedures.
