Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Records Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nueces County faces records warehouse crunch; officials recommend scanning and shredding over building new facility
Summary
Officials showed photos of overloaded courthouse and warehouse storage and proposed hiring scanning/destruction staff, buying scanners, and outsourcing shredding as a lower‑cost alternative to building or renting new space, while warning historical retention rules limit destruction of older records.
County records staff told the commissioners court the county’s records warehouse and courthouse storage are at capacity and described options to address the backlog of boxes.
A presenter displayed photos showing boxes stacked in the district clerk’s office, aisles full at the records warehouse and piles awaiting destruction. Staff estimated roughly 21,149 boxes associated with the district clerk and about 7,000 boxes for the district attorney, and noted that only a small percent of those boxes represent permanent records.
Options considered: build, rent, or 'fix.' Building a new records facility was estimated at roughly $4,000,000, while renting enough space would cost an estimated $250,000 per year. Records staff recommended a phased 'fix' that emphasizes digitization, quality control, staffing increases for scanning and destruction, and outsourcing large-volume shredding rather than immediate construction or long-term leasing.
Cost and throughput: the presenter proposed adding scanning/destruction staff totaling about $151,000 per year and a one-time hardware purchase of about $27,000 for scanners and computers. With those changes and outsourced bulk shredding the first-year costs would be roughly comparable or modestly less than leasing equivalent space, and subsequent years would be cheaper than renting. The goal is to increase destruction throughput from an estimated 5–10 boxes per week to about 50 boxes per week; at current rates the backlog could take a decade or more to clear.
Retention constraints and quality control: staff warned that archival rules designated material before 1950 as historical and thus generally ineligible for destruction; changes to the historical cutoff date (e.g., moving it later) would materially increase the permanent holdings that must be retained. The presenter emphasized that only about 1% of the stored material is permanent record and that accurate QC and training are needed to avoid destroying records that must be retained.
What’s next: records staff asked the court to authorize a program of hiring targeted scanning/destruction personnel, purchase scanners and related equipment, and outsource heavy-volume shredding while continuing quality-control procedures to identify permanent records prior to destruction. Commissioners requested additional revenue/budget breakdowns to finalize decisions during follow-up budget work.
