Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fence Setbacks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs 5‑foot sidewalk setback for corner‑lot privacy fences
Summary
Following staff presentations and debate on sight lines, aesthetics and easement risks, the commission recommended amending corner‑lot fence rules to require a 5‑foot setback from sidewalks (replacing an initial draft of 0 feet) while allowing limited exceptions in back‑to‑back side‑yard scenarios.
The Planning & Zoning Commission on Dec. 9 recommended an amendment to corner‑lot fence requirements that incorporates a 5‑foot setback from sidewalks for privacy fences taller than 4 feet.
Staff presented graphics and satellite images to illustrate typical corner‑lot configurations, sight‑line triangles and how a 15‑foot setback had been used in the draft ordinance to address visibility and pedestrian comfort. The draft initially allowed 0‑foot setbacks in certain cases to match what the code permitted for 4‑foot ornamental fences; staff said a 5‑foot setback is a compromise to preserve some green buffer between the sidewalk and taller privacy fences.
Commissioners raised several concerns during deliberation: the visual impact of a tall privacy fence immediately adjacent to a sidewalk, snow‑drift accumulation and maintenance, effects on pedestrian comfort and sight‑line safety at driveways, and the risk of placing fences within public utility easements. Staff responded that public‑utility easements and specific vision‑triangle requirements remain controlling constraints and that a 5‑foot setback more often balances property‑owner desires with neighborhood continuity.
After public‑hearing closure and additional staff clarifications, a commissioner moved to amend the ordinance to require a 5‑foot setback from sidewalks (motion seconded by Horst) and the commission voted to recommend that amendment to the council.
The recommendation emphasizes consistent streetscape aesthetics and pedestrian comfort while preserving a pathway for property owners to seek variances or follow Board of Adjustment processes where unusual lot configurations or easements exist. The City Council will consider the commission’s recommendation at a subsequent meeting.
