Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Efficiency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discuss energy-efficiency loan, timing mismatch between debt repayment and verified savings
Summary
During the Aug. 6 budget workshop, staff and commissioners debated timing: a state energy conservation loan funds courthouse energy retrofits, but verified savings will be recognized with a year-long verification, delaying transfers of savings to debt service, staff said.
Get email alerts on the Energy Efficiency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff told commissioners that an energy-efficiency loan will be repaid from verified utility savings but the timing of realized savings and debt repayment does not align.
Speaker 4 explained the repayment timing: "the debt repayment schedule is faster than the energy savings calculation," meaning the county must retain cash until savings are verified and cannot immediately apply projected savings to debt service. The loan referenced in the discussion was described as a state energy conservation (SAECO) loan with a roughly 15-year payback period.
Speaker 1 said the county hired a third party (LNB) to verify actual savings and that verification requires 12 months of measured consumption data plus contract verification time. "We hired LNB to help us verify the savings that Johnson Control says we're going to get in the cost of energy," Speaker 1 said, adding that the contractor guarantees savings and the contract requires the contractor to make up any shortfall if guaranteed savings are not realized.
Staff explained operational details: the reduced utility cost will appear in day-to-day budgets (public works/building maintenance), staff will transfer realized savings to a special revenue or debt-service account after verification, and the county expects to be "a year behind" before applying those savings to loan payments. Commissioners and staff discussed whether early repayment is allowed; staff said early repayment is permitted under program rules and could be considered if substantial savings are verified.
No formal action was taken; staff said they will continue to monitor savings via the contracted verifier and report back as the verification period completes.

