Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Comite Diversion topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Comite diversion update flags Florida Gas relocation and FERC review that could delay pilot project

Amite River Basin Commission (ARBC) · October 8, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Officials reported near-complete parcel acquisitions for the Comite diversion canal but said a newly identified Florida Gas pipeline relocation tied to FERC review and Brooks Lake considerations could add years to the project; commissioners criticized Corps-related delays and urged alternatives analysis.

An update on the Comite River diversion canal presented to the Amite River Basin Commission noted substantial right-of-way progress but raised new technical and permitting hurdles that could slow the project.

Mister Bankston reported parcels are nearly all acquired and provided bridge-completion percentages for several routes. "The Comey diversion canal monthly meeting was held on September 17th," he said, and listed LA 964 at about 84% complete and LA 67 about 77% complete.

Bankston introduced Mr. Marino, who said Florida Gas — a utility affected by the Brooks Lake portion of the project — has responded to FERC questions and that additional surveys and utility relocations will likely be required. "Florida Gas now is one of those utilities that's gonna have to be relocated," Marino said, noting further design and permitting work will determine the cost and schedule implications.

Commissioners expressed frustration at the resulting schedule risk. Commissioner Harrell said the delays and shifting technical findings were inflicting emotional harm on residents and that the process was unacceptable: "It's ridiculous. It should be criminal," Harrell said. Commissioner Raiford warned the region may exhaust funds before the system can be made operational and described the situation as "a sad day." Bankston and others said the Corps of Engineers and federal reviews were driving the uncertainty.

Board members urged evaluating whether the diversion could function without Brooks Lake work or whether alternative design options could avoid protracted utility relocations. Staff recommended continued engagement with the Corps and further design-level study to determine whether the project could proceed in phases while utility issues are resolved.

No formal decision was recorded; commissioners requested further examination of options and potential impacts to schedule and funding.