Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tourism Affiliate Program topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pacific tourism group weighs joining Missouri Division of Tourism affiliate program

Pacific Tourism/Visitor Center Committee · September 10, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Pacific tourism committee discussed joining the Missouri Division of Tourism affiliate welcome-center program, noting requirements for highway signage, a minimum of five extra racks, about 100 brochures, annual inspections and upfront costs that members said merit further study.

Pacific tourism committee members discussed whether to apply to the Missouri Division of Tourism affiliate welcome-center program, focusing on signage, brochure requirements and staff capacity. Speaker 2, who reported on conversations with program staff, said the affiliate program would permit a Pacific-only information rack but would require additional racks and a large, geographically diverse set of brochures. "We would have to have a minimum of 5 additional racks that would hold other brochures from throughout Missouri and need about a minimum of 100 different brochures," Speaker 2 said.

Speaker 2 also described the principal benefit as a dedicated highway sign, and named Ashley Snead as the program lead and Ron Young as the local contact for signage work. On costs, Speaker 2 said in one passage the first-year cost would be about $8,800 and that annual participation would be $880; the transcript contains a later inconsistent reference to "88100" as a first-year construction figure, which the committee did not reconcile during the meeting. Speaker 2 said the Missouri Division of Tourism would inspect affiliate centers at least once per year and reserves the right to amend program documents without prior notice.

Board members raised operational concerns. Speaker 4 questioned whether staff could absorb the added work of learning many brochures and contacting brochure providers; Speaker 2 agreed that centers must procure brochures themselves and that staff training would be necessary. Members also debated branding trade-offs, with some preferring a locally branded billboard and others valuing the state affiliate's standardized signage.

After discussion, members agreed not to take a motion that night and to revisit the application later — likely next year — after further consideration of budget, staff capacity and sponsorship options. No formal vote on joining the affiliate program occurred at the meeting.