Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Veterans Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Assembly committee releases bill to create veterans oversight board; critics cite cost, scope and unclear authority

Assembly Committee on Military and Veterans' Affairs · September 19, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A3459 would create a Department of Military and Veterans Affairs oversight board made up of heads of veteran organizations and pay members $1,000 per monthly meeting. Witnesses warned the board could be unwieldy, costly and may conflict with county‑level veteran service officers.

The Assembly Committee on Military and Veterans' Affairs released A3459, which would create a statewide oversight board in the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs to oversee veteran service officers, boards, councils and programs. The proposed board would be composed of the heads of veteran organizations that hold 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) status; members would receive a $1,000 per diem for each monthly meeting attended, and the board would be required to post strategic reports on the department website.

Robert Nolte, speaking for the Vietnam Veterans of America, New Jersey State Council, objected to the per‑meeting $1,000 allowance and warned the board could include dozens of groups, making it expensive and administratively cumbersome. "Are you really gonna pay everybody a $1,000 to come to a meeting?" Nolte asked, saying the structure could invite participation driven by compensation rather than expertise.

Other witnesses raised operational concerns about oversight of county veteran service officers, noting many county service officers are county employees paid and supervised locally; they cautioned the bill does not resolve how board oversight would interact with county administration and suggested the membership definition and qualifications for "heads" of organizations be clarified to avoid gaming or unintended turnover issues.

Chairwoman Tucker said the committee would move the bill out of committee but asked the sponsor, Assemblywoman Murphy, to revisit provisions and propose amendments to address membership definitions, per diem administration, and oversight authority. The committee recorded a roll call and released A3459 for further work.