Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adaptation Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers hear competing approaches for coastal resilience: buyouts, beach nourishment and managed retreat
Summary
Witnesses described a mix of approaches to coastal adaptation'Blue Acres buyouts, federal beach nourishment, nature-based restoration and managed-retreat tools'and stressed the need for stable funding and attention to equity and affordable housing siting.
Legislators heard a range of adaptation strategies for coastal New Jersey, from federal-state buyouts to large-scale beach nourishment and nature-based restoration, and they were pressed to confront trade-offs involving municipal budgets, equity and affordable housing siting.
The DEP and NJOEM witnesses described the Blue Acres buyout program and how federal funding, state matching and long project timelines interact. Angarone and an NJOEM mitigation officer said the state has received hundreds of buyout applications: "Since the storm we've received over 630 applications," the mitigation witness said, adding that the state has been able to secure funding for more than 200 properties and had closed on 59 homes this year. Angarone told members the department values counties'cale valuations when determining buyout offers and said the program is funded primarily with federal resources.
Several witnesses argued that beach nourishment and engineered dunes have demonstrable protective value. Kimberly McKenna of Stockton University described long-term monitoring by the New Jersey Beach Profile Network and said federally funded post-Sandy nourishment and engineered dunes had reduced damage where projects were in place. Tom Harrington of the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association cited a US Army Corps calculation that federal beach nourishment projects in New Jersey and New York avoided roughly $1.3 billion in damages after Sandy, and he urged increasing the state Shore Protection Fund to better match maintenance costs.
Other witnesses cautioned that nourishment is expensive, temporary and can deepen inequities. Tim Dillingham of the American Littoral Society urged nature-based approaches (marsh restoration, oyster reefs) and warned that repeated nourishment can reinforce overdevelopment and limit public access if management infrastructure does not keep pace. New Jersey Future representatives stressed the need to coordinate land-use and stormwater planning, flagged exceptions in REAL for transportation projects, and raised the challenge of siting affordable housing given new flood-zone definitions.
Why it matters: Witnesses repeatedly returned to funding as the binding constraint. Panelists suggested options including a state bond, a dedicated shore protection fund increase, or other stable revenue sources to replace waning competitive federal grant opportunities.
What's next: Committee members asked DEP, NJOEM and stakeholders to provide prioritized funding lists and further detail on how buyouts, managed retreat, and housing obligations could be coordinated.
