Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rail Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly committee moves rail-safety package after hoursof testimony from industry, unions and community groups
Summary
A4460, a rail-safety bill that would require two-person crews on hazardous-material trains, require wayside defect detectors and limit hazardous train lengths, was favorably released by the committee after extensive testimony from rail companies, unions, environmental groups and residents. Industry witnesses cited federal preemption and operational concerns; unions and community groups cited Paulsboro and East Palestine as reasons for state action.
After more than two hours of testimony, the Assembly Commerce Committee on Wednesday voted to release A4460, a rail safety bill that would impose a set of state-level safety requirements for trains carrying hazardous materials. Key provisions include a minimum two-person crew on hazardous trains, requirements for wayside defect-detection systems, limits on the length of hazardous trains, and bridge-inspection reporting protocols coordinated with state agencies.
Representatives of the New Jersey Railroad Association and major freight railroads opposed the bill in testimony, arguing several provisions are preempted by federal law, impose operational burdens that could fragment interstate rail operations, and direct state authorities into areas long governed by the Federal Railroad Administration. "Rail safety is our number one priority, but we believe this bill contains several provisions that are specifically covered by federal law and are thus not needed in New Jersey," said Bob Bailey, president of the New Jersey Railroad Association.
Union members, first responders and environmental and community groups urged passage. Ray (Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers) and other rail workers argued that two-person crews and shorter hazardous trains increase the ability to detect and respond to faults or derailments, limit blocked crossings and accelerate emergency response. "Nobody will fly a plane with only one pilot. Why would we have only one person on a train carrying hazardous materials?" a union witness asked.
Environmental witnesses and local residents cited the 2012 Paulsboro derailment and the East Palestine, Ohio, incident as evidence of the consequences of inadequate safeguards. Supporters said wayside detectors and limiting the size of hazardous trains reduce the chance of long, complex derailments that can imperil densely populated areas and critical infrastructure such as reservoirs.
Industry witnesses answered questions about technology readiness and costs: they said basic detectors exist but standards and deployment density are evolving and argued that hasty, prescriptive state mandates risk relying on static specifications where the technology is advancing. Rail representatives also noted that the FRA has recently begun to issue rules on crew size, and said that many rail-safety items have federal standards and oversight.
Committee members debated preemption and the appropriate balance between federal standards and state-level protections for New Jersey's densely populated communities. After the hearing the committee voted to release the bill for further consideration. The chair said releasing the measure will allow more detailed drafting and negotiation while preserving state oversight of issues the panel views as important to local safety.
Next steps identified by committee members include technical fixes to align state requirements with federal law, clarification of scope (hazardous trains vs. all trains) and potential coordination agreements with federal and state agencies on detector deployment and bridge-reporting rules.
Votes were recorded and the chair announced the bill had been released; members emphasized the legislation will be refined in subsequent committee work and in consultation with industry, unions, first responders and state agencies.
