Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cemetery Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wallsburg council wrestles with cemetery policy, ownership and fees for century‑old plots
Summary
Council members reviewed a cemetery ordinance that references Utah law on abandoned burial plots and debated procedures for reverting unused plots to the town, how to verify lineage, appropriate pricing and whether relatives should receive discounts. They asked staff and advisers for a clear, uniformly applied policy.
Get email alerts on the Cemetery Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wallsburg council members spent extensive time Oct. 24 reviewing the town’s cemetery policy and how to treat burial plots last used decades ago.
Council discussion focused on an ordinance clause that refers to state law allowing burial plots unused for 60 years or longer to revert to town ownership. Members said the statutory language is difficult to interpret for town staff and requested a clear operational policy that specifies verification steps, transfer fees and any discounts for relatives.
Multiple members described scenarios in which relatives claim lineage but lack formal documentation, and asked how the town should balance ethical considerations against administrative fairness. One council member said they did not want to appear to favor requests from people who live outside the valley but also did not want to charge excessive fees when families sought to regain plots.
Options the council discussed included: offering a reduced price to verified relatives, requiring documented proof of lineage or original purchase receipts, setting a standard refund or transfer price (for example, verified original purchase price or a modest administrative fee), and a process to notify presumed relatives before assigning reverted plots for reuse.
Council members asked staff to research the statutory language in Utah Code further, consult with county contacts and return a draft cemetery policy that the council can apply uniformly. There was no final decision at the meeting; members agreed a written, townwide policy is needed so any action taken would be consistent for all claimants.
