Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Decisions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Maine Human Rights Commission: votes at a glance — four contested matters
Summary
At its quarterly meeting the commission issued a reasonable-grounds finding in the Abbott Laboratories matter and no‑cause or split findings in three other contested cases; the panel also denied an extension request in a General Linen Service matter.
The Maine Human Rights Commission resolved four contested matters at its quarterly meeting and took several procedural votes.
Key outcomes
• Baez/Vazda v. Abbott Laboratories (E220339A): The commission found reasonable grounds to believe Abbott Laboratories discriminated and retaliated; conciliation was ordered.
• Sajek v. General Linen Service (Z22‑0360): The commission denied the respondent’s request for an extension and, after hearing, adopted the investigator’s recommendation of no reasonable grounds. Recorded votes on the finding were: Commissioner David — No; Commissioner Douglas — Yes; Commissioner Walker — Yes; Commissioner Sanders — Yes.
• Evans v. JDR Rental (H240262 a–c): The commission adopted split investigator recommendations, finding no reasonable grounds on some counts and reasonable grounds on others (disability/service-animal and sexual‑orientation counts); reconciliation/conciliation was recommended where appropriate.
• Jordan v. Housing Foundation (H240263 a–c): The commission found no reasonable grounds to believe discrimination had occurred regarding the complainant’s accessible parking assignment; commissioners noted the complainant currently has access and may refile if denied in the future.
Procedure and next steps
The commission said it will send written letters to parties and counsel confirming results in each matter. Where reasonable grounds were found, the commission directed conciliation efforts. Where no reasonable grounds were found the matters were dismissed; split-findings cases will proceed according to the investigator recommendations.
