Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Investigation Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs study of independent review for police investigations, recommends bill be pursued
Summary
The Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee voted to recommend further legislation on HB1566, which would create a statutory pathway for independent review of police investigations after family concerns; members said more study is needed on scope, burden and process.
The Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee voted to recommend further legislation on House Bill 1566, a proposal to establish a formal process for independent review of certain police investigations.
Supporters said the measure is about accountability and ensuring families have a clear, automatic route to independent review. "The family made it clear that this wasn't about their situation. This was about making sure that there was accountability," Representative Wheeler said, arguing the bill would "codify" a review mechanism that some witnesses asked for.
Opponents and skeptics urged caution. Representative Mannion said existing channels — including reviews conducted by county attorneys, state police and the attorney general's public integrity unit — already address misconduct allegations and cautioned that the bill could be framed around disagreement with findings rather than proven misconduct. "If there's any misconduct done in a police department, the state police or the attorney general are going to investigate that," he said.
Members also raised practical concerns about capacity and language. Several legislators warned the bill could create a new workload for the state police or an administrative body, requiring careful criteria to avoid generating hundreds of duplicate reviews. Representative Newman urged drafters to scrutinize statutory terms — noting that replacing "may" with "shall" would change obligations and could create unintended mandates.
The committee heard that the bill arose after emotional testimony from grieving family members and that supporters want a more transparent, accessible process. At the same time, members recommended that anyone drafting the legislation convene county attorneys, law-enforcement chiefs, victim-witness advocates and other stakeholders so that a study or bill is informed by operational realities.
On the motion to recommend HB1566 for future legislation, Representative Wheeler moved and Representative Salig seconded. The roll call yielded a majority in favor, and the committee asked Representative Wheeler to circulate a short report by the end of the week explaining next steps.
The committee did not finalize statutory language; members said that a study committee or a carefully drafted bill should precede any requirement that would expand agency obligations.
