Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Equipment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Putnam County panel approves $150,000 asset-forfeiture purchase of pistol-mounted optics for sheriff’s deputies
Summary
The Protective Services Committee approved using $150,000 in federal asset-forfeiture funds to buy pistol-mounted optical devices and related equipment for the sheriff’s office after a presentation on training, holsters and safety benefits.
Get email alerts on the Police Equipment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Putnam County Protective Services Committee voted Dec. 17 to approve a $150,000 purchase of pistol-mounted optical devices for the sheriff’s office using federal asset-forfeiture funds.
During discussion Lieutenant Taylor, who in the transcript identified himself as “Lieutenant Taylor from Pompano County Sheriff’s Office, corrections division,” described the optics as an industry-standard technology that “allows you to focus on whatever threat is ahead of you” and said the devices improve sight acquisition and broaden officers’ field of view. “The greatest ability … it allows you to see the hands of somebody,” he said.
Committee members asked whether focusing through an optic could reduce awareness of threats behind an officer; Taylor and department staff replied the optics increase situational awareness compared with traditional iron sights and that training and qualification standards are being updated. Staff said Safariland-brand holsters that accommodate the optic are included and that the Division of Criminal Justice Services and the Municipal Police Training Council (DCJS and MPTC) have been updating qualification and training standards.
Questions about cost produced two figures in the transcript: a brief exchange cited around $792 for a line-item, while a later line gave $7,194.80 “per unit” when accessories were included. The transcript does not reconcile those numbers; the committee’s discussion referenced both numbers while staff described the procurement as inclusive of optics and necessary holsters and attachments.
Mister Sadriaki thanked the committee for using asset-forfeiture funds rather than local taxpayer money. The chair moved to approve the expenditure; the motion was seconded and the committee recorded its approval.
The committee’s stated next steps are procurement and staff-led training and qualification for deputies. The approval uses federal seizure/forfeiture funds and committee members noted the purchase will not draw from the county’s general-tax levy.

