Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Osha Volunteer Firefighters topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Local fire leaders warn proposed OSHA standard could strain volunteer departments
Summary
Volunteer and career fire leaders told the Chautauqua County Public Safety Committee that OSHA’s proposed emergency standard — which incorporates multiple NFPA references — would impose substantial training, medical and administrative costs and could threaten volunteer recruitment and retention without phased or funded implementation.
Local fire leaders told the Chautauqua County Public Safety Committee that a proposed OSHA emergency standard, issued in February, could create significant burdens for volunteer fire departments if it is implemented without a lengthy, funded phase‑in.
"OSHA come out with a new emergency standard rule that they rolled out in February this year… the NFPA reference is 21 different documents that would become incorporated into the OSHA law, which really poses a hardship on a lot of fire departments," Greg Scott, 4th Battalion coordinator and volunteer firefighter, said. Scott warned the NFPA references could convert general OSHA guidance into strict standards, increasing requirements for medical screening, equipment replacement and pre‑planning.
Randy Apperson, fire chief in Bemis Point, said medical surveillance and training requirements could shift costs to volunteers and create a barrier to participation: "Under the NFPA standard, the firefighter would be required to take a firefighter level physical… the cost of that is around $1,500 per person per year," Apperson said. He and other presenters also described expanded training prerequisites (firefighter 1/2, fire officer 1–3) and administrative duties for pre‑plans and specialty units (for example, water rescue), which they said volunteers may struggle to meet without more accessible local training and funding.
Speakers urged a measured approach: they are assembling a county subcommittee to monitor changes, educate departments and prepare comments during the federal public‑comment window. "We're not saying no to a change… we're just saying not yet," Scott said. Committee members asked staff to stay informed and consider drafting supportive statements or positions if requested by the volunteer community.
The presenters emphasized that updated standards contain useful safety elements but said implementation timelines, access to training and funding support are essential to prevent eroding volunteer capacity that currently provides a large share of first‑responder coverage.
The committee agreed to remain briefed as the federal rulemaking progresses and encouraged local fire leaders to submit written comments during the public comment period.
