Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

County staff seek permission to pursue assignment of Vantage‑area water right with Ecology

December 23, 2024 | Kittitas County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County staff seek permission to pursue assignment of Vantage‑area water right with Ecology
Arden Thomas, Kittitas County water resources manager, asked the Board of County Commissioners on Dec. 23 for direction to submit a letter to the Washington Department of Ecology (Office of Columbia River) seeking technical review of whether a long‑standing change application in the Vantage area could be assigned to the county.

Thomas said the application — filed in the 1980s and described in the record as among the most senior change applications in the Office of Columbia River’s queue — has no specific development plan tied to it. "By partnering with the county, we would enable that," Thomas said, explaining assignment could allow Ecology to process the right for a general development scheme that could serve the applicant's property and other parcels and provide mitigation options for future development.

He cautioned that assignment would commit the county to an annual mitigation fee tied to the amount of water authorized for mitigation, and estimated that fee in the "realm of 17 to $30,000 per year." Until water users are paying, Thomas said those costs would be borne by the county water fund, which has sufficient fund balance to absorb the expense in the near term.

Thomas also flagged local concerns about market concentration in the Vantage area: "Right now, there's only 1 source of water rights and 1 water system provider, and that is a private company," he said, noting the county’s interest in expanding options for residents.

Commissioners asked clarifying questions about land‑use designations and how the letter should refer to the unincorporated town; staff said they would verify terminology to avoid unintended legal consequences and return with a refined letter if directed. The board did not take formal action at the study session but indicated staff may proceed to coordinate with Ecology pending any requested edits to the draft letter.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI