Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fleet Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee recommends allowing lieutenant take-home cars and backs purchase of traffic enforcement vehicle

Brentwood Public Safety Committee · October 23, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee voted to recommend amending the employee handbook to allow lieutenants take-home command vehicles because of 24/7 response needs, and it recommended the board consider buying a dedicated traffic-enforcement vehicle funded from asset-forfeiture funds; committee discussed fleet size (16), an asset-forfeiture balance over $400,000 and EV vs. gas tradeoffs.

The Public Safety Committee recommended the full board consider two related vehicle items: (1) amending the employee handbook to allow commanders and lieutenants to use take-home command vehicles due to their on-call responsibilities; and (2) authorizing purchase of a dedicated traffic-enforcement vehicle, with asset-forfeiture funds suggested as the funding source.

Chief Spies said the department currently operates a fleet of about 16 vehicles (plus a UTV and a canine car) and described day-watch pressures when multiple cars are decommissioned for service. He said the take-home request stems from the lieutenants’ 24/7 response requirement and regular use of command cars for training, scene response and interagency duties. Committee members asked about mileage reimbursement alternatives and the long-term effect on fleet size; staff said modeled budget adjustments will be handled through Ways & Means and the board.

On the traffic vehicle, the chief reported the asset-forfeiture account holds over $400,000 with a recent roughly $110,000 deposit. He presented two procurement options: a Chevrolet Blazer EV (or similar) and a Tahoe gas SUV; both would require upfitting (radios, in-car computer and camera) and extra equipment. Cost estimates in discussion placed a fully equipped vehicle in the mid-$50,000s (roughly $57,000–$58,000) plus upfit costs. Committee members weighed EV charging/time-to-charge and operational availability versus gas vehicles and directed staff to pursue the procurement path preferred by the board. The committee moved and seconded a recommendation to the full board to consider purchasing the vehicle; a motion to forward the vehicle-handbook amendment to Ways & Means also passed.