Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Text Amendment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Brentwood P&Z rejects broad text amendment to allow personal-service businesses in light industrial district, urges conditional-use route

Brentwood Planning and Zoning Commission · November 13, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning & Zoning Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of a proposed text amendment that would add personal-service establishments as a permitted use in the light industrial district, instead recommending the Board of Aldermen allow such uses only by conditional use; applicant may apply for a CUP and return to P&Z before Board review.

The Brentwood Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously recommended that the Board of Aldermen reject a proposed text amendment (P&Z 24-21) to add personal-service businesses as a permitted use in the city’s light industrial district, instead urging the Board to add the use as a conditional use so sites receive site-specific review.

Drew Clary of Intellica Commercial Real Estate presented the application on behalf of owner Bamboo Equity Partners and a prospective tenant, Monarch Beauty Collective, for a building at 2001 South Hanley Road (rebranded as Hanley Point). Clary described the tenant’s services — body sculpting, eyelash extensions, permanent makeup, spray tanning, Botox and fillers — and said the use is appointment-only and similar in traffic impact to professional-office uses.

Commissioners raised planning concerns about adding a broadly permitted right in the light industrial district, saying the district has been incrementally altered and a blanket change could encourage uses in locations that are ill-suited. Commissioner Sherry Bilderback and others urged a conditional-use path to preserve the Commission’s ability to assess site-specific parking, traffic and compatibility issues. Staff noted that a text amendment would apply citywide within the district and that a conditional use would require notice, a separate application and a public hearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission prior to Board consideration.

The Commission voted to reject the text amendment as submitted and to recommend that the Board of Aldermen adopt an amendment allowing personal-service establishments in the light industrial district only as conditional uses. Staff told the applicant the Board of Aldermen is scheduled for a first-reading/public hearing on Dec. 2; the applicant was advised to file for a conditional-use permit and return to the Planning & Zoning Commission (next P&Z meeting cited as Dec. 11) so the Board could consider site-specific findings on a timely schedule.

The applicant acknowledged the conditional-use route may delay tenant occupancy but said the tenant is on a deadline to secure space. The Commission’s recommendation is advisory; any change to the code would require Board of Aldermen action.