Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bond Millage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Novi board begins formal conversation about protecting millage rate, eyes 2025 bond timing
Summary
Board members discussed protecting the district millage to preserve capital funds, reviewed timing options (Aug./Nov. 2025 or spring 2026), and asked staff and municipal advisers to return with financial scenarios and a recommended timetable for a potential bond question.
Get email alerts on the Bond Millage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Novi school board on Dec. 19 opened a formal discussion about whether to pursue action in 2025 to "protect the millage rate," a step district staff described as essential to preserve capital funding for roofs, boilers, playgrounds and other facility needs.
District staff explained that local capital for facilities is raised through voter‑approved millages; as property values rise, levy rates can decline unless voters authorize protection or renewal. "When that millage rate drops off, the school district is unable to then utilize or access additional capital without going out to the community and asking them to increase taxes," a staff presenter said, framing the rationale for considering a protective measure rather than waiting until property values change and debt service dynamics could force a higher rate.
The board discussed timing and strategy. Staff said municipal advisers and bond counsel are being engaged, and projected that the timing of any tax‑rate shift could occur in late 2025 or early 2026 depending on property‑value data; staff identified feasible election windows in 2025 (May, August, November) and noted August is typically lower turnout while November midterms generally bring higher engagement. Staff advised that an 84‑day filing deadline applies before an election and cautioned that preparing bond language, actuarial tables and public engagement would make a May 2025 target tight.
Board members asked for specifics on scope and community use of funds. Staff described priorities under consideration: high‑school modernization and wayfinding improvements, middle‑school repairs, elementary playground upgrades and maintenance items such as roofs and boilers. Several trustees emphasized the importance of clear communications to voters and possible community benefits (expanded public access to facilities such as the Meadows building).
District staff proposed a phased outreach plan, including more town halls and bond committee meetings in early 2025 and multiple board approval points for bond language and amounts. Trustees did not vote on a plan on Dec. 19 but asked staff to return with municipal‑advisor scenarios, proposed timelines and suggested ballot language options for later votes.

