Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grading Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dorchester 02 staff propose consolidated grading, AP exam and retention clarifications
Summary
Curriculum staff proposed combining reading and language-arts grades in upper elementary, setting final exams at 20% of course grade, clarifying AP/EOC procedures and outlining retention/acceleration criteria including a 90th-percentile benchmark for acceleration.
Curriculum staff presented multiple proposed edits to grading, assessment and promotion policies at the June 10 committee meeting, aiming to clarify how course grades, end-of-course tests and AP exams are handled.
Speaker 3 and curriculum staff (Speaker 10) recommended replacing separate reading and language-arts grades in grades 3–5 with a single English/language-arts grade because standards are integrated. The draft also standardizes that a final exam will account for 20% of the final grade. Speaker 10 said those adjustments reflect current practice rather than a substantive change to teaching.
On AP and IB exams, staff recommended removing an IB reference (district does not provide IB), clarifying that some courses (AP, PLTW) may have exams that do not produce numeric scores in time to be averaged into final grades, and allowing the district to recover costs from students who elect not to take an AP exam after the district has already paid the testing vendor. Speaker 10 said AP scores typically arrive in July and therefore cannot be used to compute a course’s final grade.
Under promotion and retention (IKE), staff proposed grouping kindergarten with grades 1–2 for promotion language, leaving Read to Succeed requirements separate, and outlining acceleration criteria: academic indicators (90th percentile in reading and math) plus maturity and other background evidence; staff estimated accelerations have been rare (about 3–5 students in recent years).
Next steps: staff will provide additional data — including how many students decline AP exams and fiscal implications — and the committee expects further review before voting to advance policy language to the full board.
