Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Putnam County budget panel reviews microtransit pilot, lease costs and mandated transit fees
Summary
The Physical Services committee reviewed funding for a Patterson microtransit pilot, advertising and vehicle-wrap costs, an increased lease-transportation ceiling tied to a new Via contract, and a mandated quarterly MTA payment of $95,069. Staff said federal and state aid and ARPA/CRF funds will offset local costs.
Putnam County legislators on the Physical Services Committee on Wednesday reviewed budget lines tied to a new microtransit pilot in Patterson and broader transportation costs, including a significant rise in lease-transportation spending and a statutorily mandated MTA payment.
Committee members heard that the county is finalizing a microtransit contract for a Patterson pilot that also serves parts of Carmel, Kent and southeast Putnam and that staff plan public outreach and branding once the contract is awarded. "Once the contract is awarded, we're going to have to go out...do a lot of advertising and have public hearings," a county staff member said, describing vehicle wrapping and signage to promote the service.
Why it matters: the pilot is tied to a new contract with a private operator (Via) and will affect both operating and lease budgets. County staff told the committee the lease-transportation line was increased to cover the current MB contract and the not-to-exceed amount for the Via pilot, but actual costs will be based on mileage and rider counts and are expected to be partially reimbursable through STOA and federal grants.
The panel also reviewed a mandated quarterly payment to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. "This is a quarterly payment of $95,069 under the statewide master transportation operating assistance plan, pursuant to section 18b of the transportation law," a staff member said, explaining the obligation is statutory and level with last year.
Committee members questioned a $16,000 advertising line for the microtransit rollout; staff said vehicle wrapping costs average $4,000–$5,000 per vehicle and the outreach budget covers community notice and branded materials. On equipment and fleet, staff noted several county vehicles have very high mileage and asked for increased contingency for major repairs to keep aging units running while replacements arrive.
Outlook: officials said they expect federal and state transportation funding, plus existing ARPA/CRF balances, to reduce the county's net exposure for operating costs, and that the Via contract's actual expense should be lower than the not-to-exceed amount because it is driven by usage metrics. The committee did not take a final funding vote on the microtransit contract during the meeting.
Funding and next steps: staff indicated outreach and brand development will follow contract award and that the committee will revisit lease and operating projections as mileage and ridership data become available.
