Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Agriculture topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Putnam County committee approves concept to tighten Ag‑District inclusion documentation, drawing advisory‑board objections

Putnam County Physical Services Committee · December 16, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A resolution to require site plans, stormwater protection plans, soil surveys, a town code‑enforcement letter and certified abutter notice for parcels seeking inclusion in agricultural districts was approved in concept and forwarded to the full legislature; advisory‑committee members said staff bypassed their board.

Mister Tolman of the Department of Public Works presented a resolution the committee approved "in concept" to require additional documentation when applicants request inclusion in Putnam County agricultural districts.

Tolman told the committee the draft would require a site plan, a stormwater protection plan and a soil survey for each parcel proposed for inclusion. He said staff would also seek an additional requirement that a town code‑enforcement officer certify there are no outstanding violations and that applicants send certified return‑receipt notices to abutters describing the proposed inclusion and intended use.

During debate a committee member objected that the draft was not presented to the agricultural advisory committee and argued that omitting that committee diminished its role. That member warned the change risked undermining the purpose of New York State agricultural districts, citing the 1971 law establishing those districts and saying, "You're crippling farmers in New York State."

Other legislators and staff responded that the goal was not to restrict farming but to "clean up" application files so the county can present complete documentation to the state when requesting inclusion. Tolman said the additional materials were intended to reduce unresolved issues with towns and provide clarity about proposed uses and notifications to neighbors.

The committee voted to approve the resolution in concept and forward it, with two staff‑proposed amendments to add the town verification and abutter notification requirements, to the full legislature for final consideration.