Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Staff Studies topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears updates and directs staff on impact-fee research, permitting review and Ballantyne master plan

Richland County Services Committee · December 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee directed the county administrator to research impact fees, commission a review of residential permitting and environmental standards, and consider a Ballantyne neighborhood master plan; staff said more detailed updates will return in February or as assigned to the committee.

The Services Committee received staff guidance and directives on several non-action items and pending analyses.

On impact fees (Item 5a), the Chair directed the county administrator to research and present current law and the potential benefits of enacting impact fees in Richland County to reduce the tax burden on residents; packet pages 27–32 were cited and staff said an update is scheduled for the committee’s February meeting.

On permitting (Item 5c), the Chair moved to commission an analysis of the county’s residential development permitting processes and standards related to noise, flooding, air pollution and other environmental impacts, with potential recommendations to update the land development code, design manual, comprehensive plan and zoning map. Staff indicated that if the analysis requires more resources a future fiscal-year budget request may be needed.

On Ballantyne (Item 5d), the Chair moved to consider developing a neighborhood master plan to preserve community character and protect the Lake Murray watershed; staff said this item will be taken up as assigned from council to the committee and that no additional staff materials were presented today.

Committee members asked for nonresidential revenue estimates from impact fees and for clarifications on next steps; staff and the county attorney noted timing and potential budget implications. No votes were taken on these pending-analysis items; staff will return with more detailed information.