Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission adopts ordinance updating tax rules for assisted lower-income housing

Grand Rapids City Commission · December 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission adopted changes to Grand Rapids City Code sections governing taxation of assisted lower-income housing, removing some unit-count thresholds, clarifying mortgage and utility definitions, and adding property-maintenance compliance as a requirement for rehabilitation incentives.

The Grand Rapids City Commission voted unanimously to adopt amendments to sections 1.410 through 1.414 of Chapter 9, Article 5 (Title 1) of the Grand Rapids City Code addressing taxation of assisted lower-income housing.

Commissioner Esauce, who brought the ordinance forward, said the final language reflects review earlier this year and adjustments discussed at the midyear review: the ordinance removes a minimum five-unit requirement for workforce rental projects, establishes thresholds for rehabilitation investments (including a $25,000 threshold for rental units and a standard tied to assessed value for owner-occupied units), clarifies definitions for mortgage loans and utilities following guidance from Michigan State Housing Development Authority counsel, and requires housing projects to comply with the city property-maintenance code.

Mayor Rosalynn Bliss thanked commissioners and community members for amendments that "removed some of the barriers for this tool," and the commission proceeded with a roll-call vote recorded by the clerk. Commissioners Robbins, Perdue, Knight, O'Connor, Goei, Esauce and Mayor Bliss all voted yes and the ordinance carried.

Why it matters: The edits change eligibility and administrative clarity for rehabilitation incentives tied to assisted and workforce housing projects and narrow some prior thresholds. Supporters said the revisions remove barriers and better align the ordinance with state guidance; the transcript records no formal amendments after the final language was presented.

Next steps: The ordinance was adopted at the meeting and recorded via roll-call; staff will proceed with implementation under the revised code sections.