Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Rewrite topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff outlines zoning rewrite to speed reviews, expand administrative approvals
Summary
City consultants presented a multi‑meeting rewrite of the zoning ordinance proposing more administrative review by the zoning administrator for permitted projects, clarified special use and rezoning standards, and revised nonconforming‑use and performance‑guarantee rules; commissioners requested safeguards and reporting.
Consultants from Giffords Webster presented a multi‑meeting zoning ordinance rewrite to the Saginaw Planning Commission, emphasizing streamlined site plan review and expanded administrative authority for the zoning administrator. Andy Aymond described changes in Articles 6 and 7 designed to speed permitting, reduce procedural bottlenecks for routine projects and align approval standards with the master plan and contemporary best practice.
Aymond said the draft would create four review streams: (1) permitted uses with no site/building changes (administrative review), (2) permitted uses with changes but no waivers (administrative), (3) permitted uses with waivers (commission review), and (4) special land uses and rezonings (commission review). He said expanding administrative review is intended to help housing and small businesses move forward faster: “If it meets the zoning requirements…why require them to wait two months to get on a planning commission agenda?” he asked.
Commissioners generally supported clearer standards but raised oversight and transparency concerns. A former zoning administrator warned that transferring approvals to staff removes a public check the commission has historically exercised: “I was told from above, you will approve this… I saw where the planning commission was able to put a stop to a couple of those,” he said, urging safeguards. Commissioners asked for a mechanism to track administrative approvals — a monthly or agenda report — and asked that documents and approval records be accessible to the commission and public; the consultant agreed to add or clarify reporting language.
The rewrite also tightens special land‑use criteria (adding pedestrian and bicycle safety considerations tied to the master plan), formalizes conditional rezoning procedures, raises the damage threshold for rebuilding nonconforming structures from 25% to 50% (with a defined valuation method), and allows the zoning administrator and engineering staff to require performance guarantees and temporary‑occupancy protections.
Aymond said appeals of administrative decisions would still go to the Zoning Board of Appeals, while special‑use and planned‑unit‑development decisions would be subject to circuit‑court review, consistent with current practice. The commission scheduled two more content meetings before considering a public hearing and formal vote; commissioners asked to receive 'before and after' flowcharts and the annual report showing recent site plan review volume to better evaluate the proposed administrative shift.
The presentation closed with agreement to continue the review at subsequent meetings; no ordinance changes were adopted tonight.
