Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Crisis Response topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Danvers committees consider crisis-response team after bullying incidents; Accessibility Commission proposes coordinated rapid response
Summary
The Accessibility Commission presented a draft statement and proposed a crisis-response team to partner with the Human Rights and Inclusion Committee to respond to community incidents and bullying more quickly; members supported the idea in principle but urged careful, deliberative planning before implementation.
The Town of Danvers Accessibility Commission on Dec. 19 proposed forming a crisis-response team with members of the Human Rights and Inclusion Committee to respond to incidents — including reported adult bullying — in days rather than months. Christie Fair, chair of the Accessibility Commission, told the committee the group drafted a statement and discussed a model for a nimble, cross-committee response that could convene relevant stakeholders and coordinate outreach.
"We could have a rapid response team — part Accessibility Commission, part Human Rights and Inclusion Committee — so we can be a little bit more nimble in how best to respond and act," Christie Fair said, explaining the proposal grew from recent local incidents the commission has discussed.
The idea responded directly to public comments earlier in the meeting. Ellen Graham of precinct 4 urged the committee to weigh in more directly on adult racist bullying in town and asked that the HRIC be included on any town-manager selection subcommittee to make sure diversity, equity and inclusion perspectives are represented.
Committee members broadly welcomed a structured response but raised cautions about speed and process. One member said the term "rapid" risked implying action without sufficient consultation; Dr. Desmond said some incidents require deliberation and negotiation before the committee should act. Fair clarified she meant a crisis response on a timeline of days rather than hours and emphasized the aim was to be nimble within a deliberative framework.
Members discussed next steps: researching other municipal models, drafting a clearer scope for the response team, identifying volunteers and community partners, and beginning organizational work after Jan. 1. The chair said the HRIC would solicit volunteers from its membership and invited the Accessibility Commission to return with possible models and a more detailed plan.
No formal policy or motion to create the crisis-response team was adopted at the meeting; the proposal remains at the discussion and planning stage with work to continue in early January.
