Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident presses Valley Stream officials over paved playground, asks for parents’ committee
Summary
A resident told trustees the village paved over a playground at Flyman's Field without adequate community consultation and asked that the board create a committee on children's issues; an official (Speaker 1) said the playground was unsafe, cited ADA and liability concerns, and pledged a bigger, ADA-compliant replacement, while acknowledging communication gaps.
A resident (Speaker 2) used the public-comment period to criticize the village’s handling of playground work at Flyman's Field, saying the surface was paved over without community consultation and that repeated requests for information from village staff went unanswered.
"When we make decisions that affect public spaces, we must engage the community and ensure that things like this that our needs are considered," Speaker 2 said, adding that the small, fenced playground had been a sanctuary for babies and that Valley Stream lacks many playgrounds specifically designed for infants. The speaker asked whether the mayor and board would consider creating a committee or commission focused on children's issues so parents and stakeholders could be consulted on projects such as playground repairs and safety measures.
Speaker 1 responded that village officials concluded that keeping a playground in the middle of a parking lot was unsafe and that the board planned to replace the paved area with a "much better playground, not in the middle of the parking lot." Speaker 1 described the village's record of installing safer, ADA-compliant equipment at other sites, said grants include ADA stipulations, and noted that the village would pursue a new playground even if a grant were denied.
Speaker 1 also acknowledged communication problems about the project timeline, saying staff (named in the record as Tom McAleer and others) manage grant proposals and scheduling and that the village would follow up to provide an updated timeline and contact the resident. Speaker 1 warned that leaving a non-ADA-compliant playground open after notification could expose the village to litigation and financial risk, which is why officials closed the site.
The exchange concluded with Speaker 2 reiterating frustration at lack of response and requesting clearer opportunities for community input; Speaker 1 promised follow-up contact and to pursue installation of a replacement playground.
The record does not specify the grant amount, exact installation dates, or the formal mandate for any new committee; those details were described as "not specified" or handled by staff and community volunteers (identified in the transcript as "SPARK").
