Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Carousel Donation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pittsfield council refers carousel donation to mayor for study after wide debate
Summary
After public pleas from volunteers and donors, the Pittsfield City Council voted unanimously to refer a proposed donation of the community carousel and a parcel at 50 Center Street to the mayor to form a study committee that will examine costs, grant conditions and operational options.
Philip O'Rourke, a former high-school woodshop teacher and carousel volunteer, told the council the volunteer group has secured offers of financial support and that the carousel's current owner has offered to donate the ride to the city. "We intend to support the carousel with no expense to the city," O'Rourke said during the open‑microphone public comment period.
The council's longer debate on Item 15 centered on whether the city should accept a conveyance of land at 50 Center Street tied to conditions in the donor's agreement, how quickly the carousel could reopen, and whether the city or a community partner should operate it. Mayor Marchetti told councilors he had proposed a mayoral-appointed committee to study options and said he was willing to oversee work that could include community partners and foundation support.
Councilor Warren urged rapid fact-finding, proposing the mayor or committee obtain (1) any state grant details and conditions (including a 2013 grant the council discussed as $250,000), (2) a reasonable list of municipal or nonprofit carousel operations for comparison, and (3) an informal estimate of removal or relocation costs from the local builder involved in the original construction. That proposed amendment failed on a roll-call vote.
Supporters at the meeting emphasized the volunteer effort and potential non-city funding. Stephanie Talanian, another volunteer, said the carousel "was designed" as a community project with educational and arts components and asked the council to "do everything in your power to see that it doesn't just sit there." Opponents and skeptical councilors cautioned the agreement contained multiple "nonstarters" and stipulations they said could unduly limit options or create long‑term obligations.
After extended discussion about timelines and the donor's conditions, the council voted unanimously to accept the finance committee report and refer the matter to the mayor to create a study committee to examine feasibility, financing, operations and potential conditions attached to the donation. Councilors emphasized the committee's work would return to the council before any final acceptance of the gift or action that commits city resources.
Next steps: the mayor will assemble the committee and return findings and recommendations to the council for a future decision on whether to accept the donation and under what terms.
