Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Redistricting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Long redistricting debate ends with nomination of Sue Morales to senate vacancy

Weston County Board of County Commissioners · November 19, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After an extended debate over redistricting, constitutional interpretation and statutory timelines, the Weston County commissioners nominated Sue Morales for a vacant state senate seat; one commissioner abstained, citing legal counsel and timeline concerns.

A lengthy portion of the Nov. 19 meeting focused on redistricting, statutory deadlines and the county’s authority to name a replacement for a state senate vacancy.

Commissioners discussed Article 3, Section 3 of the Wyoming Constitution and whether the state’s districting approach aligns with that provision. Some commissioners and members of the public argued county representation should follow county lines and pushed for a nomination at the meeting; others urged caution, citing a statutory five‑day rule for accepting nominations and the risk of litigation.

The chair read the two remaining names on the slate — Patricia Baumann and Sue Morales — and allowed commissioners to ask questions. Legal counsel and the county attorney’s prior advice were cited multiple times, and commissioners discussed the risk that courts could later overturn actions taken outside statutory requirements.

After discussion and one abstention by a commissioner who said the county attorney had previously advised against the process, Commissioner X moved to nominate Sue Morales for the senate vacancy and Commissioner Y seconded the nomination. The board voted by voice and the motion to nominate Morales passed (Morales accepted the nomination and withdrew the secondary nomination). The transcript records the vote as voice approval; one commissioner abstained.

Speakers during the debate included elected officials, a local resident identified as a senator who voiced strong support for the process, and county representatives who described historical redistricting efforts and potential legislative remedies. Multiple participants emphasized this is a state‑level constitutional issue and noted possible future legislative or court action.

What’s next: The board submitted the nomination and commissioners said they expect potential legal challenges but moved to proceed in the interest of local representation.