Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Production Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hundreds of public comments press Revere Council to rethink housing production plan
Summary
Dozens of Revere residents urged the council either to move ahead carefully with the draft Housing Production Plan or to block perceived overdevelopment. Speakers voiced concerns about density, affordability, parking and developer protections; the council tabled the plan for further Committee of the Whole review.
Dozens of Revere residents addressed the City Council during the meeting's public-comment period, delivering sharply contrasting visions of the city's proposed Housing Production Plan and asking the council to either slow down or press forward with the draft.
"It is, quite convoluted and appears to be hell bent on turning the city into a concrete jungle," said Christine Robertson (187 Charter Street), who warned the plan would increase congestion and erode neighborhood character. Several other speakers echoed worries about density, loss of single-family homes and the effect of new multifamily projects on parking and schools.
Other residents urged action. Laura Holmes (243 Campbell Avenue), a member of the Revere Housing Coalition who participated in the plan's working group, said the plan represents substantial research and a starting point for deliberate policy: "This is a lot of research...I look forward to seeing Revere make progress on this." Taylor Giuffre Catalano (90 Lancaster Ave) said reviewing the plan could help younger residents remain in the city.
Speakers raised requests for further detail. Anthony Paziali (51 Arcadia Street) asked the council for revenue projections and estimates of how many affordable units the plan could produce over 10- to 15-year horizons. Others pointed to state-level pressure: Travis Alpert (East Coast International Church) said if localities do not act intentionally, the state could impose solutions that reduce local control.
A contentious moment came when Ed Terrell (70 Sewell Street) raised an allegation about a former economic development director being under FBI investigation; the chair declined to answer such questions during public comment.
After public comment and subcommittee discussion, the chair reported the housing production plan has been tabled for further consideration at the next Committee of the Whole meeting, allowing more time for review and public input. The council did not take substantive votes altering the plan at this session.
Next steps: the Committee of the Whole will continue consideration; residents and councilors signaled they expect more analysis on projected revenues, unit counts, and implementation details before any final action.
